![]() ![]() Australia started it by alleging that China originated the coronavirus pandemic, but Beijing then responded by bullying the Australians with a tariff and trade war. ![]() AUKUS is more confrontational vis-à-vis China, whereas the EU plan is more cooperative and broad-based, emphasizing “an open and fair environment for trade and investment” and an agenda for climate change and connectivity.ĪUKUS is underpinned by Australia’s conflict with China, where it is hard to gauge who is most at fault. While both AUKUS and the EU’s Indo-Pacific strategy intend to uphold the rules-based liberal international order, their conceptualization is fundamentally different. Beyond these concerns, the AUKUS deal to share Anglo-American nuclear technology to enable Australia’s acquisition of eight nuclear-powered submarines over two decades poses challenges to other major powers, particularly the European Union and its key members as well as Japan.įor the EU and its “strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific”, AUKUS is a clear challenge. Not only will the trilateral security partnership provoke China, but it will likely further divide Southeast Asia and overshadow ASEAN-centered cooperative vehicles, such as the East Asia Summit. The Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) security pact has caused ripple effects across oceans and continents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |